Skip to content
YewForge Digital / Engineering

Canonical public model

Architecture

Koda is being assembled as a governed operating environment: interfaces, bounded capabilities and evidence records are designed to remain legible to the human operator.

CurrentLast reviewed: 15 July 2026Publisher: YewForge Digital

Architecture model

The public architecture is deliberately capability-oriented rather than a deployment diagram. It describes the roles that sources support without exposing internal addresses, service arrangement, authentication detail or operational attack surface.

Human authorityApproval, review and exception handling remain explicit.
WorkshopDesktop operational interface for state, plans and evidence.
Bounded capabilitiesOrgans, nodes, tools and non-AI services have constrained roles.
Evidence layerProject state, validation records and provenance support review.
Interface directionShards, desktop and future mobile surfaces make state legible.

Components and control flow

Workshop and orchestration

The Workshop is the operational interface direction. Existing evidence supports reusable desktop components and read-only Command Centre work; it does not establish universal orchestration of all planned systems.

Models, organs and tools

Koda distinguishes models from bounded service-like capabilities. An Organ is a subsystem responsible for a limited capability such as telemetry, scheduling or evaluation. Tools and non-AI services are not described as agents merely because they participate in a workflow.

Evidence and project state

Evidence records, gates and project state provide a constraint layer. They preserve distinctions between a design, a prototype, a validated result and a blocked experiment. This is central to the programme's claim discipline.

Interfaces and runtimes

Core Shard and Shard-family work explores a continuous object language rather than conventional windows. Desktop runtime and mobile directions are related but not interchangeable: the available public record supports a minimal desktop runtime proof, while mobile integration remains planned.

Governance and authority

Human final authority is a design constraint, not a cosmetic statement. The programme uses gates, explicit review outcomes and no-go records to prevent a planning document, partial prototype or fixture from being represented as a finished operating capability.

Architecture boundary: relationship visualisation is intentionally deferred until stable identity and provenance sources exist. A diagram is not used as a substitute for missing relationships.

Known limitations

  • Current source material does not establish complete model routing or a unified scheduler across all proposed systems.
  • Stable identity contracts are incomplete for some future relationship maps.
  • Detailed security topology and operational controls are not suitable for public release.
  • Many interface and research elements remain prototypes, concepts or future-only directions.

Sources: KPCF-001, KPCF-006, KPCF-007, KPCF-009, KPCF-010, KPCF-014; public-safe Portfolio Architecture R0.